"The whole thing comes from the images of the cock pit imbedded in the building but still
intact... there's some good points to be made about how this is possible... and their are
some answers. "
Well, not entirely. Everything from the winglets to the tail rudder remained perfectly intact
upon entering the structure--this is what made the impact somewhat anomalous for
many researchers.
"When the twin towers were built a radical new design was implemented to
accommodate the desire to make them reach so high... it relied on essentially building a
frame from which the insides of the building would hang. this was a complex spiderweb
of steel, NOT concrete. and at the higher levels of the building the distance between the
girders is more than 15 feet. the inside of the buliding basicaly hangs from this skeleton."
That's just flatly untrue. The main structural support component of the towers was a
central spindle that consisted of multiple steel columns, encased in concrete,
interspersed with dozens of elevator shafts (this comprised 25% of the floor area). The
floors themselves were constructed of slabs of concrete interlaid with webs of steel
trusses (radial trusses ran from the perimeter to the central spindle, and concentric
trusses connected the latter.) The 'skeleton' was the web-like outer perimeter of steel.
The central spine of steel columns bore most of the weight of the structure, while the
outer rim of closely-spaced steel columns stabilized the floors and held the trusses in
place. But the structure certainly doesn't 'hang from the skeleton.'
"So the second plane just happened to hit somewhere in the middle of these girders...
menaing at that speed, it pulverized glass, some mortar, and thin framing steel... not a
surprise that the plane itself was fairly unscathed until the wing base hit a beam!!!
"You see? These terrorist types aren't stupid. They studied the buildings, made educated
aproximations of where the planes would need to hit for maximum damage and even
charted theoretical models of the blast radius. It was the unique design of the WTC that
allowed the fuel blast to channel down the tower and super heat the structure enough to
cause a collapse. And the people that drove the planes in their knew it when they did it."
That's why I believe a closer examination of the collisions themselves is warranted. The
impact sites were just too fortuitous to chalk up to simple coincidence.
"Now, if you want to have a real discussion about this sh+t there is a wealth of
information out there, much of it very reliable that can lead even smart people to some
harrowing conclusions about who might be ultimately responsible or just plain complicit
in the damage done on 9-11.
But this video conspiracy is a crock.
e"
Well, I've read the wealth of information. And since it's basically been definitively proven
that a boeing 757 did NOT strike the western wall of the pentagon (try
physics911.org for a primer)...you then have to account for the missing plane or planes
(AA11 and UA175) somehow. I wasn't drawn to the video manipulation/hologram theory
on a whim.